Independent guidance for authors · Your work remains yours

Review standards

Trust requires more than a flattering quotation.

We do not publish unattributed testimonials or invented outcomes. This page sets out the standards by which author projects, research, and recommendations should be considered.

Evidence before praise.

Any future author review should be published only with clear permission, an identifiable source, and no claim that one result predicts another.

Our standard

What a responsible review should provide.

01

A clear basis

Recommendations should explain the genre, readership, goals, and public information on which they are based.

02

Useful boundaries

A review should distinguish preparation from representation and informed guidance from legal advice.

03

A practical next step

Authors should leave with specific questions and actions, not pressure, hype, or a promised outcome.

A considered next step

Bring the question you are facing now.

Submit your requirements